Intel Denies Possibility of 14th & 13th Gen CPU Recall Amid Heightened Consumer Woes From Instability Issues, 65W & Above CPUs Affected

Intel Denies Possibility of 14th & 13th Gen CPU Recall Amid Heightened Consumer Woes From Instability Issues, 65W & Above CPUs Affected

 0
Intel Denies Possibility of 14th & 13th Gen CPU Recall Amid Heightened Consumer Woes From Instability Issues, 65W & Above CPUs Affected
Intel 14th & 13th Gen RMA Requests Met With Huge Delays Due To Stock Availability Issues 1

Intel has responded to the most "awaited' questions surrounding their 14th & 13th Gen CPU instability fiasco, and by the looks of it, the company looks clueless.

The crashes, instability, and performance issues present in Intel's 14th Gen & 13th Gen CPUs are bothering several consumers out there to the point where it is unbearable, with game studios, retailers, and even professionals from the community coming out expressing their resentment against the issue.

To top it all off, Team Blue's response to the issue is making the problem even more complex than ever, and it looks like the new set of replies by the company of questions posed by The Verge show that Intel is not only clueless but "negligent" as well.

First of all, upon asking whether Team Blue plans to implement a recall, the firm has straight up denied rumors, claiming that they won't take a business hit. Intel doesn't have a sales halt planned either, and neither are channel inventory recalls. Apart from this, the firm didn't close statistics on the overall Intel CPUs affected by the instability issues, and neither did they cooperate with The Verge on disclosing the reason behind "selling these chips ahead of any fix."

Will Intel issue a recall?

No.

Has Intel halted sales and / or performed any channel inventory recalls while it validates the update?

No.

Will Intel extend its warranty on these 13th Gen and 14th Gen parts, and for how long? 

[No answer yet.]

Given how difficult this issue was for Intel to pin down, what proof will customers need to share to obtain an RMA? (How lenient will Intel be?)  

[No answer yet.]

- Intel via The Verge

This is just the first bit of "unresponsiveness" by Intel since the next part will bother consumers further. Upon asking about RMA and servicing procedures, Intel declined to comment on the matter and didn't even bother to answer about the recent RMA rejections on the unstable chips. The company, "showing pity", did disclose which products were affected, and here is what they have to say:

Intel Core 13th and 14th Generation desktop processors with 65W or higher base power – including K/KF/KS and 65W non-K variants – could be affected by the elevated voltages issue. However, this does not mean that all processors listed are (or will be) impacted by the elevated voltages issue.

- Intel via The Verge

In terms of asking about the end or at least a mitigation for the problem, Intel revealed that they are confident that the upcoming microcode patch will be an effective solution, potentially putting the problem to an end; however, the firm is still assessing the situation, includes its scope of influence along with how grave the problem is, or whether a simple microcode will fix it. So, in shorter terms, right now, Team Blue is completely clueless and is hanging to a rope, hoping that a microcode will fix the problem, or else, all will stumble.

New Intel 14th Gen & 13th Gen CPUs will ship out with the microcode patches; however, existing users will need to implement them via BIOS update once available. Team Blue didn't answer whether they will extend warranty servicing on the affected units, and neither did it comment on the general RMA process required to return the CPUs affected by the instability problem. This shows that either Intel has left its consumers in the void, or the company might come up with a detailed guide addressing everything, and we do hope the latter probability is true here.

Here's a timeline of Intel's CPU instability issue, how Team Blue has switched up the statements, and the way they have dealt with the problem:

  • [Dec 2022] The first instances of "Out of Video Memory" issues on 13th Gen Core i9 CPUs were reported back in 2022. (Source: Reddit). This is a few months after the release of Intel's 13th Gen CPUs & RTX 40 GPUs.
  • [Throughout 2023] Several users have started reporting game crashes and issues in high-profile AAA titles such as Callisto Protocol and Hogwarts Legacy (among many others). Both tiles are based on Unreal Engine (released in 2023) and feature a shader compilation process at the start. There are currently thousands of such issues reported on Steam Community Forums and Reddit.
  • [February 2024] A post by Sebastian Castellanos brings the issue to the limelight, highlighting the "worrying trend" of stability issues affecting 14th and 13th-gen CPUs.
  • [February 2024] Our editor along with various other tech outlets start reporting the issue and bringing the matter on to the mainstream media. Quickly, it is pointed out that underclocking and undervolting the chips can result in better stability.
  • [April 2024] NVIDIA Issued a formal statement that the stability issues are not related to its GPUs but rather Intel CPUs.
  • [April 2024] Intel announces its investigation of the reports of instability issues affecting 13th and 14th Gen CPUs.
  • [April 2024] Motherboard makers quickly roll out "Baseline" power profiles in new BIOS, which lower power limits on high-end 14th & 13th Gen CPUs but also lead to significant performance drops.
  • [May 2024] Intel releases a statement, recommending motherboard makers to ship "Intel Default Settings" in BIOS by default rather than customized settings.
  • [June 2024] Intel discovers a bug within its eTVB microcode while investigating the root cause of 14th and 13th Gen Instability issues. This doesn't fix the instability problems. Board makers quickly roll out BIOS with a new microcode fix.
  • [July 2024] Intel denies an RMA to HardwareTimes editor who already RMA'd at least two CPUs which produced instability issues.
  • [July 2024] Wendell from Level1Techs & Steve Burke from GamersNexus are the first big tech media outlets on YouTube to further highlight the instability issues, diving into additional details such as OEM frustration with the matter and a possible recall.
  • [July 2024] GamersNexus highlights a potential "oxidation" defect being a problem with a certain batch of Intel 14th & 13th Gen CPUs that might lead to instability problems.
  • [July 2024] Intel says the 14th & 13th Gen Mobile CPUs are not affected by the same instability issues as the desktop CPUs.
  • [July 2024] Intel issues a statement confirming that they have found the root cause of the instability issues which happen to be elevated operating voltages and will be issuing a new microcode fix to its partners by mid-August.
  • [July 2024] MSI is the first motherboard manufacturer to confirm that it will have a BIOS ready with the latest microcode patch available after Intel's release by mid of August.
  • To Be Continued...
  • We at WCCFTech are the voice of the consumers affected by the Intel CPU instability issue, and we are too surprised by how Intel has dealt with the issue the whole time. Neither do they comply with RMA requests, and despite independent media outlets approaching the firm, Intel is trying to sideline them by every means possible. A business model cannot sustain itself without caring for its customers, and with Intel's statement denying a large-scale recall, it looks like the company is prioritizing business here, which isn't sustainable at all.

    Given that Intel's Arrow Lake-S desktop CPU release is right around the corner, the situation is deteriorating with the days passing, and Intel might have hit a nail in the coffin in terms of consumer reputation with the recent development. We can only hope that a microcode patch fixes the problem, but by the looks of it, the situation is a whole lot worse.

    News Source: The Verge

    What's Your Reaction?

    like

    dislike

    love

    funny

    angry

    sad

    wow